No. This is because the NDIS is not means or assets tested. It is a scheme that funds services, equipment and supports only; it does not provide income. There may be some indirect impact for the purposes of assessing what is ‘reasonable and necessary’ for the NDIS to fund. For example, if Mary’s inheritance in a protective trust is a residence for the child to live in, the NDIA may argue that in her situation, it is likely not ‘reasonable and necessary’ for the NDIS to pay for (some or all of) her housing. It is reasonable to expect her family, via the trust, to continue to provide her with the house as an ‘informal support’. [see 34(e), NDIS Act 2013 (Cth)].